Short, high-signal posts on outsourcing drafts, drafting MSAs and SOWs, Singapore MAS disclosures, India court-petition formats, and the quiet mechanics of legal research memos. Written by the advocates who review the work on our files.
A research memo is not an advice note, an opinion, or a deliverable for the end client. It is a working document that answers a specific legal question with binding authority. Here is when to brief one, what a good memo looks like, and how to spot a bad one.
Read the note →The Master Services Agreement carries the risk allocation. The Statement of Work carries the deal. When the two collide — on IP, acceptance, warranties, or termination — lawyers get burned. A precise separation, clause by clause.
Read the note →The economics of first drafts have shifted. Here is how small and mid-sized firms are outsourcing contract review — ethically, supervised, and with a qualified lawyer signing off every file — at roughly one-third of partner rates.
Read the note →MAS Notice SFA 04-N12, FAA-N16 and PSA Notice 02 shape the disclosure architecture of every Singapore-regulated financial contract. A practical field note on how drafts should accommodate the regime — and where lawyers routinely overreach.
Read the note →The format of a petition is not decoration. It is the difference between a matter taken on file and a matter refused registration. A working guide to CPC Order VI & VII, High Court Rules, and the drafting discipline that still matters under BNSS.
Read the note →Every deliverable we draft for a law firm is reviewed by an advocate qualified in the jurisdiction of the matter. Along the way, we see the same structural questions repeated across firms, cities, and continents. We write them up so you don’t have to ask them again.
See the services catalogue